From our viewpoint, information provided by companies at
this week's mid-quarter financial updates was rather
contradictory to each other. For starters, Intel told
investors that it would not revise the revenue and gross
margin guidance previously given last April and that the
second quarter is shaping up as they expected, while HP
executives said its business downtrend continues and the
company has no "crystal ball" to predict its
bottom.
Xilinx, the No.1 maker of programmable logic
chips used in networking equipment, said that it sees a
considerable slowdown in product cancellations and
delays, while Juniper Networks, the networking equipment
maker specializing in core routers, revised its outlook
for its second quarter results and announced job
cut-backs.
Our
analytical approach is to find the commonality among the information provided by these
companies. First, we looked at Intel's statement saying that its second quarter is shaping
up as they expected. This statement is substantiated by comments given by Mr. Hector Ruiz,
Chief Operating Officer of Advanced Micro Devices [NYSE:AMD], the No.2 microprocessor chip
maker, who also said that the sluggish global personal computer market would return to
normal in the fourth quarter of this year.
Second, Ms. Laura
Conigliaro, analyst at
Goldman Sachs, said this week that her recent checks with a large U.S. distributor
suggested that the U.S. (server) business was stabilizing with
a
slight
positive uptick.
Third, EMC told investors in its recent EMC [NYSE:EMC] open communication statement, that
the company would stick with its previously discussed 2001 revenue growth target of 20% or
greater. All of the above statements point to an uptick in the IT and PC business in the
second half of this year, rather than a continuous slowdown.
According to CBS Marketwatch, Morgan Stanley's networking analyst Christopher Stix
believes that Cisco Systems [NASDAQ:CSCO] is on a mission to offer customers discounts to
undercut Juniper. Taking into account Xilinx's executives comment saying that the company
sees a considerable slowdown in product cancellations and delays, we believe that
Juniper's problem may be in part due to pricing pressure from competitors including Cisco
Systems.
From our commonality analysis, we conclude that the slowdown in IT spending, as well
as in the PC business seen at HP and Juniper Networks, may be due in part to intensifying
competition, rather than being an industrial-wide issue. This is particularly true for HP
where the competition in all sectors including ink-jet printers, PCs, UNIX servers and
data storage, is fierce in an already slow business environment.
|